
- Articles
- What Do Baby Boomers Need and Want?
- How to Turn Students Into Producers
- Games in E-Learning
- All About Generation Y
- Best Practice: Hands-on Legal Practice via E-Learning
- Copyrights – Who Owns What on the Web?
- Open Educational Resources: Threat or Opportunity for Publishers?
- Economic Crisis Boosts E-Learning
- Promoting Cultural Dialogue with E-Learning
- Expert Session: Publishing Meets E-Learning
- Open Education Resources: Unstoppable or Unsustainable?
- Competing in a Global Economy Through Open Education
- Master’s Programme: Online Education in Veterinary Tropical Medicine
- E-Learning for Kids: Benjamin's House of Wonderful Words
- Microtraining for Dutch Truck Drivers
- Research: Learning 2.0 in Europe
- Dutch Police Build Virtual City
- Meeting the Needs of the New Learners
- A Fresh Start for E-Books?
- Portugal: Mobile Phones in Schools
- A Networked Life – Ton Zijlstra on Social Networking
- What We Need is Top-End Content
- Learn to Make Quick Decisions – With Your Mobile
- Exploring Archaeology in Second Life
- Online Educa Berlin 2008: How Does Generation Y Learn?
- Reaching Employees and Customers Efficiently
- European Teens United in Cyberspace to Tackle Bullying
- The Talking Essay – Video Feedback for Students
- Mobile Gaming for Dutch Students
- E-Learning for the Ne(x)t Generation of Students
- Video-Supported Learning Keeps Students in Line
- A Vision for Tomorrow’s Learners: MEDEA Awards 2008
- Introducing Michael Wesch
- New Conference Formats at Online Educa Berlin
- Back to main
Vlog by Dr. Peter Scott, Centre for New Media, Knowledge Media Institute, Open University, UK
In the near future, you will know when a worker is ‘powerful’ when you can measure more “knowledge work” than “information work” in the work they are doing. Indeed, from this perspective, learning is knowledge work, and knowledge work is learning. Similarly, you will know that a technology is ‘powerful’ when it becomes invisible, perhaps even so embedded in your world that it can be considered to be ‘ambient’. And finally, the future will show that formal and informal models of learning will start to combine powerfully into a joint strand which is some way between both; something like “non-formal” learning.
In one recent study of peer-to-peer learning, we examined a naturalistic, live, online-set of video meetings, in which an international group of students attended a hundred or so live, online ‘study group’ events. The one study included over 120 hours of live meeting time. And some of the meetings were very large, with up to 34 participants! But all these events were entirely self-organized, and self-managed by the student community itself. They shared work together and supported each other in their learning. All this work happened in a non-formal context. This means that the work was not wholly ‘formal’ in that the students were not meeting in a ‘sanctioned’ or ‘managed’ working context directly connected to an accredited programme of study. On the other hand it was not ‘informal’ in that there were a clear set of formal drivers behind each student giving them very good (and formal) reasons for being there, and working hard!
Many students and workers can now interact online with learning content and working materials that are provided openly on the internet and not clearly tied either to their working organization or to their learning programmes of study. And yet they can still interact with this material and with other non-formal workers/learners in a very rich variety of ways. What is interesting is that, when they are released from the formal setting, many learners and workers of all ages and in all sorts of different roles are now able to use sophisticated new tools to interact with content and with others without that formal supervision or support. What is terribly interesting is that these workers seem to be capable of substantial ‘epistemic agency’ in that they can manage and direct their work and learning very effectively, and that they are very good at supporting the work of others using such systems. Indeed, they seem to be very effective knowledge workers.
In our studied communities, our new tools can start to get a tantalizingly rich glimpse of the nature of the knowledge work and learning that is now possible in the new non-formal web world. It is almost banal now to talk about the power of e-learning and e-working, so pervasive are these technologies! They are becoming (almost) invisible and in some places (almost) ambient. This is not a new wave that we need to control, rather we need to ride it and understand it.
By Peter Scott, Centre for New Media, Knowledge Media Institute, Open University, UK
Some of Peter’s recent URLs:
http://kmi.open.ac.uk/people/scott
References
Scardamalia, M. (2002) Collective Cognitive Responsibility for the Advancement of Knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal Education in a Knowledge Society (pp. 67–98). Chicago: Open Court.


